What surprised me during the reading was the many different types of innovation, invention, extension, duplication and synthesis. I never thought of there being multiple types of innovation, because essentially what one is doing is providing a solution to a problem. The different solutions can be classified into different classes but it's really unnecessary.
As I was reading more the duplication innovation part confused me. Duplication is not innovation by any means. Putting a different touch on something does not mean that you created a whole new product but that you used the idea to your advantage.
When Apple comes out with a new version of their products a few weeks later companies like Samsung, LG and Nokia come out with similar products, with the same gadgets and perks. They aren't creating something new but changing the shape and calling it their own.
My question to the author would be why he thought that duplication could be a type of innovation. Also is there a need for the different classifications, and if so what is it?






